ANANDA ALERT! teen missing from Ward Close 7:31 AM
Water woes to affect sections of St Catherine and the Corporate Area 5:13 PM
Suspected goat thief collared in Adelphi 3:00 PM
Gay student allowed to wear tolerance T-shirt to school 2:41 PM
Sections of St Mary to experience water woes 1:52 PM
Guyana police probe New York taxi driver's death 1:27 PM
Letters to the Editor
Who runs the show?
Monday, January 23, 2012
Dear Editor,
Big international sports organisations such as the World Cup, the Formula One Racing Series and the Olympic Games are quickly losing their appeal to me. As they have got bigger, they are slowly losing the reason for their being. They began as sports events, organised to please both the participants and the spectators. They have evolved into mega businesses designed more to maximise income than to represent the sports involved. Sports have become costly spectacles.
The present brouhaha between FIFA, the international sports association governing the World Cup and the country of Brazil, the next organisers of the matches, is a good case in point. FIFA sets minimum standards for playing conditions such as the number of stadia as well as logistics of general transportation and security of the participants. But over the years FIFA has developed a cosy relationship with its sponsors and opted to maximise income rather than focus on the sport in the games. It accepts vast amounts of money from its sponsors and licenses what it considers authentic and exclusive material such as souvenirs and T-shirts representing the sport.
Now FIFA has gone even farther. It is now dictating to the Brazilian government that it must change its laws and sell beer at World Cup matches and eliminate the discounts conventionally given to students and the elderly. Brazil banned the selling of alcohol in 2003 as a measure to control violence at football matches. It worked. Matches are far less violent than before 2003. Brazil is a country that believes in social justice and therefore offers ticket discounts to members of its indigenous communities, its youth and its older patrons at public events. Obviously, FIFA finds these concessions to be harmful to profit maximisation. FIFA also gets a lot of money from the Budweiser Brewing Company. So Brazil and FIFA find themselves at an impasse.
My view is that no international sports organisation has the right to intervene in the legal affairs of a country. Brazil has every right to tell FIFA that it will not change its laws to serve FIFA and Budweiser. Sports must recognise the sovereignty of the Brazilian people. And that should be non-negotiable.
David Matthews
Tampa, Florida
USA
Other Stories
Assassination by anonymous e-mail is awful!
0 comments
A supermarket policy that's illegal
0 comments
0 comments
0 comments
Why risk the environment for oil?
0 comments
Fire the West Indies cricket administrators
0 comments
Kudos to James Newman and Philip Sherlock
0 comments
Embrace positive values over lewdness
0 comments
2 comments
Admiration for Archbishop Rowan Williams
0 comments
0 comments
1 comments
Warring angels and the Aksum Kingdom
0 comments
0 comments
Include all Jamaicans in nation building
0 comments
How to deal with homosexuality
0 comments
Beenie Man's about-turn raises questions
3 comments
NEPA: 90-day approval process works, except when...
0 comments
Deal with this gay issue quickly
0 comments
Where's the tolerance from the LGBT lobby?
0 comments





