Letters to the Editor

How to stop a rogue president from ordering a nuclear first strike

Tuesday, December 05, 2017

Print this page Email A Friend!


Dear Editor,

On November 15, US Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) and US Representative Ted Lieu (D-CA) introduced one of the shortest Bills in the histories of their two parliamentary bodies. Shorn of the obligatory “be it enacted, blah, blah, blah” boilerplate, the Bill's content come to 14 words: “It is the policy of the United States to not use nuclear weapons first.”

It's a short Bill and it's a good Bill, but it could be made both shorter and better by eliminating the word “first”.

What America needs is a “no use of nukes, period” policy, followed quickly by an “elimination of the nuclear arsenal” policy.

In July, 122 United Nations member countries endorsed a treaty banning nuclear weapons altogether and providing for their elimination. The US abstained from the vote and won't be signing the treaty. I'm not sure why, since the treaty wouldn't really impose any new obligations and since unstated US doctrine is that only other countries, like Iran, should be expected to live up to their treaty obligations. The US is already formally committed to nuclear disarmament by virtue of its participation in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It's just never taken that obligation seriously.

The US Congress recently took up the question of whether or not President Donald Trump can be trusted with the authority to order a nuclear strike. His personal temperament alarms them. That temperament may or may not truly be more prickly than that of past presidents, but in the age of Twitter, it's more openly alarming.

Unfortunately, Congress has ceded so much of its authority over foreign and military policy to the presidency since the end of World War II — the last time the US entered a war by congressional declaration, as required by its constitution — that trying to claw back just this one little bit of that authority is theatre without substance.

Possession of the “nuclear football” is nine-tenths of the law. To keep Donald Trump, or any other president, from using nuclear weapons wickedly (as if there were some other way to use them), Congress needs to get rid of the nukes, not just tinker with the legal authority to use them.Nuclear weapons have no legitimate military use. They are weapons of terror, not of war. It's time that the first and only Government to ever use them become the second (after South Africa) to voluntarily give them up, for its own sake and the world's.

Thomas L Knapp

Director

William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism

Florida, USA

@thomaslknapp

ADVERTISEMENT




POST A COMMENT

HOUSE RULES

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper � email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy



comments powered by Disqus
ADVERTISEMENT

Poll

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Today's Cartoon

Click image to view full size editorial cartoon
ADVERTISEMENT