|

Editorial

Withholding our votes could never be the answer

Friday, December 16, 2011



With the approach of elections it is not uncommon to hear people expressing a reluctance to vote on the basis that neither of the two major political parties is better than the other.

That cynical discourse is even more worrying coming from young Jamaicans who are the future of our country.

Based on recent polls, the bloc of people saying they will not vote is substantial, although, thankfully, it gets smaller as the elections near.

Truth be told, there are ugly elements of our politics and governance that we could never endorse, perpetuate or associate with. However, we do not believe that the answer to those ills lies in withholding one's vote. Rather, we think that the solution is to do the opposite — vote, but not in the manner in which we have become accustomed.

Instead of casting a ballot for a candidate simply because he/she represents the party which enjoys your loyalty, we suggest that the quality and integrity of the candidate should have significant influence on voters' decisions.

Of course, we expect that voters would exercise their franchise after careful examination of the parties' manifestos and deep reflection on their record. And, if the party of their choice forms the Government, we should not resile from holding them to the proposals in their manifesto.

But it is at the constituency level, we submit, that voters have real influence over how the country is governed. For it is at that level that representatives are held accountable and decisions made on their performance every five years.

So the right to vote, therefore, should not be taken lightly, neither should it be compromised on the altar of political expedience and election campaign rhetoric that, in some instances, smacks of opportunism and is devoid of a genuine commitment to making peoples lives, and the country, better.

We all should remember that the right to vote, the foundation of our democracy, was won by the blood, sweat and tears of our ancestors who, prior to 1944, were denied that right.

We also should bear in mind that there are still nations today where citizens are not allowed to vote. Instead, they are subjected to autocracy or dictatorship of one kind or another.

However, recent developments in the Middle East — particularly in Egypt, Libya, and Syria — have demonstrated to the world that people are increasingly no longer willing to accept undemocratic rule. They are eager to have a say in how their countries, and their lives for that matter, are governed. It is against that background that we encourage Jamaicans to cherish and exercise their right to vote, because none of us would wish to be subjected to the alternative to democracy.

Critically too, it is not enough, we submit, to sit back and blame only the politicians for the state of the country. For we all have a responsibility in determining the type of government we get.

And, to put it at its simplest, if we don't vote we make a mockery of our right to complain when things go bad.



POST A COMMENT


You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.

HOUSE RULES

 

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.



Comment (required):

You have characters left.
captcha 8a6fee307325427eb02807a6d5c0a904
Enter text seen above:

For information about privacy please read our Privacy Policy.

I have read and accepted the Terms and Conditions


COMMENTS (10)


1/1/2012
A rlealy good answer, full of rationality!
0o k
12/19/2011
@ John Smith
Comrade who pretend to have no Party allegiance ...they know themselves.
John Smith
12/18/2011
An "Independent Comrade"? What on Earth is that? Is that the other Damion O. Crawford? Some of these posts make zero sense.
In response to the last sentence, a sheer partisan agenda also makes a mockery of our right to complain when things go bad.
I can say for sure that if I do not see
0o k
12/16/2011
Part B.
....also a chorus of Independent Comrades hoping for a tie or close to it, forcing a Coalition Government (better to teach Jamaican Politicians a lesson).
They ignore recent history. Politicians in conjunction with the ECJ made sure total Seats are an uneven number, preventing just such a tie. Also we have been there before. 2007 Elections results is proof positive there can be zero Coalition with those who spent 18 years running Jamaica into the ground. It would be a Nightmare!
0o k
12/16/2011
Part A.
Most folks encouraging Jamaican Citizens to withhold/destroy their votes as a protest are generally Comrades who fall into two main categories:
00. ones ticked off at the Party but would never vote JLP
01. professionals who calculate, keeping away x-number of citizens will the Independent Vote shift to JLP down, thereby giving Comrades a better change to win.

Paul Gentles
12/16/2011
Withholding votes is part of the failure of the media.
If media was seen as neutral, informative, educational, fearless in unearthing and exposing corruption, tireless in pursuing the truth and exposing those who fail and held them to account - then yes Dear Editor...you would have earned the right to this Editorial!
Look into the mirror - if a paper incessantly profer the articles you promote, with cartoon editorials so 1 dimensional would you vote for what they represent?
Tom Stroke
12/16/2011
Excellent editorial. However, today's cartoon is a classic. Clovis, you are worth your weight in gold.
Stephen Fox
12/16/2011
Editor, for the most part I agree with your message. If the voter cannot stomach candidates from the JLP or the PNP please at least give the third party candidate your vote. Those citizens who are registered to vote have a national responsibility to evaluate the candidates in their constituency and chose the best available candidate regardless of party. Apathy is surrender to the status quo. If we want better governanance it starts at the polling place when we show up and cast a ballot.
0o k
12/16/2011
Generally I don't support it (since your non-vote is vote for whomever wins), but in certain circumstances it might be the only choice.
Example: A Garrison when there is open voting and you would run a serious risk of injury or worse if you defy the mob.
Lionel Gayle
12/16/2011
All I can says is: BRAVO!

Designating Mandeville a university town makes sense

  2 comments

 

A tough balancing act

  5 comments

 

Time to shift from austerity to growth strategy

  4 comments

 

Adopt the Grace Foods template

  0 comments

 

Heed Bishop Gregory's advice

  3 comments

 

Now you're talking, Mr Christie!

  7 comments

 

Gov't must use tax policy, fiscal expenditure to reduce income inequality

  0 comments

 

JPS’s first task is rebuilding trust

  0 comments

 

Complete the circle of Independence

  10 comments

 

Carib should take damaging rum subsidies to WTO

  0 comments

 

Pressure in an Olympic year

  0 comments

 

Nice move to encourage Jamaicans to vacation at home

  2 comments

 

More tax raids, yes, but more finesse too, TAJ!

  3 comments

 

What would we do without PetroCaribe?

  1 comments

 

Why Monsieur Sarkozy became a one-term president

  2 comments

 

Are these the leaders of tomorrow?

  9 comments

 

Politics of appointing and recalling our diplomats

  3 comments

 

Look what we have come to!

  3 comments

 

Bloodied, but unbowed - the splendid example of Mr Myers

  0 comments

 

Just so we don't wash our dirty linen in public

  7 comments

 

Today's Cartoon


Poll

 Do/Would you disclose details of your salary with your spouse? 
Yes
No

View Results

Results published weekly in Sunday Finance


Username:
Password: