Gas prices continue downward trend 4:59 PM
Suspected goat thief collared in Adelphi 3:00 PM
No ruling on Keith Clarke killing — DPP 2:25 PM
Sections of St Mary to experience water woes 1:52 PM
Witness tells of murder, guns and drugs at Dudus hearing 1:19 PM
Cops trying to identify man killed during shoot out last year 12:01 PM
Editorial
Nice move on that 'Kingston Interview Waiver Programme'
Thursday, February 09, 2012
IT is very pleasing to see the continuing evolution in the treatment of the Jamaican people by the United States Embassy, with the just-announced introduction of its Kingston Interview Waiver Programme (KIWP), allowing certain qualified applicants to forego the personal interview stage.
Many Jamaicans still have memories of the horrific images of Jamaicans travelling from deep rural areas in the dead of night to line up outside the embassy on Oxford Road in Kingston, to wait long hours and scorching from the broiling sun later, then to be herded in like cattle for an interview. The United States never compelled anyone to subject themselves to that, but they collected vast sums from the droves willing to dish out visa fees over and over again, in often futile hopes of visiting what is the dream destination for most Jamaicans.
That graphic imagery is a far way off from what obtains now which is a relatively stress-free system that allows Jamaicans to retain their dignity and respect, even while meeting the security standards required by America, understandable in light of the 9/11 disaster.
The interview waiver programme is essentially a reintroduction of an old procedure for expediting certain non-immigrant visa renewal but with some additional stipulations, for example, fingerprinting, a phenomenon of the post-9/11 world. So now qualified applicants must appear in person at the US Embassy for initial data intake and fingerprinting, but are not required to remain for an interview with a consular officer.
Naturally, there are exceptions to the rule about who qualifies for the KWIP, one important stipulation being that children who were granted visas up to their 18th birthday must attend in person for an interview after that age. This is obviously based on the fact that they would have been issued the previous visa on the strength of their parents' qualification.
Still, we believe that as the US strives to improve their systems, they may wish to reconsider that provision. Someone who was issued a 10-year visitor's visa at say age 17, would be an adult of 27 when it needs renewal. But that person would have had the opportunity for at least nine years (after age 18) to run off illegally in the States. If they have not done so, it is a reasonable sign that they have no such intentions, and therefore there is no need to clog up the system with them.
In any event, the consular section reserves the right to request that the applicant returns to the embassy for an interview if the information in the application is incomplete, or if there are questions about an applicant's previous use of a visa or future intent.
We don't presume to be in a position to tell the US what is best for Americans, however, we would also like to recommend a practice which the Canadians have adopted, which is to have applicants — whether seeking first-time visas or renewal — send in their particulars and only require an interview if the consular section is not satisfied that the application meets their required standards.
Nevertheless, we believe that the new waiver programme augurs well for how Jamaicans see the United States with which we have such deep and lasting ties.
In the same vein, we commend the British High Commission on its coming presentation of "Essential Visa Information" for Jamaicans who wish to visit the United Kingsom during the 2012 London Olympic and Paralympic Games.
POST A COMMENT
You must first register and then login to be able to post a comment.
HOUSE RULES
1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper – email addresses will not be published.
2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.
3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.
4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.
5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.
6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.
7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, and before commenting you need to register, conveniently, by clicking the link above.
2/9/2012
TODAY'S POLL: I believe your aim is to determine how popular the event is in Jamaica and as such you probably should have found a way to make that clear, as a lot of your readers live overseas. Therefore the result will not be a true reflection ...just saying.
Other Stories
Designating Mandeville a university town makes sense
2 comments
5 comments
Time to shift from austerity to growth strategy
4 comments
Adopt the Grace Foods template
0 comments
3 comments
Now you're talking, Mr Christie!
7 comments
Gov't must use tax policy, fiscal expenditure to reduce income inequality
0 comments
JPS’s first task is rebuilding trust
0 comments
Complete the circle of Independence
10 comments
Carib should take damaging rum subsidies to WTO
0 comments
0 comments
Nice move to encourage Jamaicans to vacation at home
2 comments
More tax raids, yes, but more finesse too, TAJ!
3 comments
What would we do without PetroCaribe?
1 comments
Why Monsieur Sarkozy became a one-term president
2 comments
Are these the leaders of tomorrow?
9 comments
Politics of appointing and recalling our diplomats
3 comments
3 comments
Bloodied, but unbowed - the splendid example of Mr Myers
0 comments
Just so we don't wash our dirty linen in public
7 comments





