Appeal Court reserves judgement in Pfizer/Lasco multimillion-dollar lawsuit

Business

Appeal Court reserves judgement in Pfizer/Lasco multimillion-dollar lawsuit

BY DURRANT PATE
Observer business writer

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Print this page Email A Friend!


The Court of Appeal has reserved judgement in the long running multimillion-dollar lawsuit brought by Lasco Distributors against international pharmaceutical company, Pfizer.

Lasco brought the case against Pfizer in 2005, seeking damages for Pfizer preventing it and another Jamaican company, Medimpex, from selling a generic form of the hypertension drug, Norvasc. Having heard legal arguments from attorneys for the plaintiff, Lasco and the defendant, Pfizer the Appeal Court last week reserved its judgement.

The judgement will be delivered at a date to be advised by the registrar of the Court of Appeal. Lasco's legal team had prepared 10 volumes of legal arguments which form the basis of its appeal against the November 2017 Supreme Court ruling awarding the company $273 million in damages.

The basis of the appeal was that the award was too small in comparison to other awards in cases of similar nature. Medimpex, which was a party to the lawsuit, was awarded $5.3 million in relation to stocks that it had to destroy as a result of the court battle with Pfizer.

The matter arose from an injunction granted to Pfizer in 2005, which remained in effect until 2012 when the United Kingdom-based Privy Council upheld rulings by the local courts in favour of Lasco and Medimpex. Pfizer had contended that the Jamaican firms violated its patent when they started selling generic versions of Norvasc in the early 2000s. But Lasco and Medimpex challenged the matter in court and won.

The local companies claimed that they suffered damages when they were barred by the court order from distributing Norvasc. Lasco had asked the court to award it US$490 million in damages, but Pfizer countered saying Lasco should be paid no more than US$518,000 for the period it was not allowed to sell the drug. For its part, Medimpex demanded US$11.5 million in damages.

However, Pfizer countered saying it should not pay out more than US$68,000 to Medimpex. In November 2017, Supreme Court judge Justice Vivene Harris awarded special damages to the local firms, but Lasco is appealing her ruling of $273 million on the basis that it should have been awarded much more.


Now you can read the Jamaica Observer ePaper anytime, anywhere. The Jamaica Observer ePaper is available to you at home or at work, and is the same edition as the printed copy available at http://bit.ly/epaperlive


ADVERTISEMENT




POST A COMMENT

HOUSE RULES

1. We welcome reader comments on the top stories of the day. Some comments may be republished on the website or in the newspaper � email addresses will not be published.

2. Please understand that comments are moderated and it is not always possible to publish all that have been submitted. We will, however, try to publish comments that are representative of all received.

3. We ask that comments are civil and free of libellous or hateful material. Also please stick to the topic under discussion.

4. Please do not write in block capitals since this makes your comment hard to read.

5. Please don't use the comments to advertise. However, our advertising department can be more than accommodating if emailed: advertising@jamaicaobserver.com.

6. If readers wish to report offensive comments, suggest a correction or share a story then please email: community@jamaicaobserver.com.

7. Lastly, read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy



comments powered by Disqus
ADVERTISEMENT

Poll

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Today's Cartoon

Click image to view full size editorial cartoon
ADVERTISEMENT